Skip to content

Eastleigh Tory candidate Maria Hutchings doesn’t ‘care about refugees’ and isn’t a fan of aids intervention & prevention in Africa

Maria Hutchings might be an MP in three weeks. She has unsurprisingly been unveiled as the Conservative candidate for the vacant parliamentary seat in Eastleigh following the resignation of future Her Majesty’s Pleasure tenant Chris Huhne on Monday. The story of Maria Hutchings though is rather an interesting one, from life-long Labour supporter to the Tory A-List along with the likes of Louise Bagshawe, Zac Goldsmith and former Coronation Street Star Adam Rickett to a spot in a very winnable seat all within two years. So what do we know about Maria Hutchings and more importantly her back story and motives for getting involved in politics?

Well she first came to prominence in 2005 when she confronted the then Prime Minister Tony Blair about the possible closure of Cedar Hall School in Thundersley in Essex. In its own words, ‘Cedar Hall School is an innovative and forward looking all age (5-16) Essex LEA School, which provides education for pupils who primarily experience global moderate learning difficulties, but who may experience speech, language, emotional, behavioural or autistic spectrum secondary disabilities.’ Mrs Hutchings you see has a son who suffers from autism and she was worried that the school would be shut.

The thing is the school wasn’t in danger of being closed by the Tory run County Council – and more importantly – it never was. ‘I had to find a way to help my son’ she vowed but helping her son didn’t require her confront the PM over anything because the school was never closing. So she was basically attacking the Prime Minister on a personal issue that was about something that was never even proposed. Sounds a bit strange to me but I will concede that I am not a parent and if you are then you might not think as logically when something may affect one of your offspring.

Speaking after meeting Tony Blair after confronting him in 2005 she said:

“Tony Blair was very, very attentive. He listened to everything we had to say. We are going to meet him again.

“He said to me that he knew something about autism. He felt sorry for what we had to go through. He said that he would be looking into all this personally.

Tony Blair has been looking out of the country at wars and issues abroad – Aids, Africa, Afghanistan and wars in Iraq – so Middle Englanders are the forgotten ones.

“The people who have to pay the taxes that keep the country going – we want our share for our families and our children.”

So she was seemingly pleased with what he said but she wasn’t happy that he was working on things like Aids in Africa, I mean who would care about trying to stop the alarming rate of Aids in Africa? Her assertions that Middle England are the forgotten ones when talking about African children in the same sentence is the biggest load of bull I have read in a long, long time. I know we all like to care about ourselves first and foremost but who really are forgotten more – Middle England or African children?


Look Tony Blair did lots of good and some bad. His bad points were pretty out there but to say things like he was looking at situations like the dire one in Africa regarding the spread of aids and say that Middle England was suffering because of it is pretty out there and something that I personally just cannot get my head round.

Anyway three weeks later – after having described herself as a lifelong Labour Supporter she was at the Tory Spring Conference speaking thanks to a personal invite from then Tory leader Michael Howard. Commentators at the same rumbled about Mrs Hutchings being used by Howard and the Tories but she refuted these claims, “I feel disgusted that you should think that I’m here as a political pawn,” she proclaimed. So within a month of being a lifelong Labour supporter, being told that the Prime Minister of the nation was looking into her case personally (the one where the school was never under any threat of closure no less) she was at the spring conference of another party saying she wasn’t being used as a political pawn by them.

This as we know turned out be true as it was her using the Conservative party. Considering she was a ‘non-political housewife’ (who had canvassed for Labour since the age of 14 – but remember she was ‘non-political’) she seemed to be getting a taste for this politics lark and the next year she found herself on the Conservative A-List of candidates. Not bad for someone who was non-political.

The next year she was selected to be the Conservative PPC for Eastleigh, one of the top Tory target seats. Eastleigh had been Tory for donkey’s years until the Lib Dems stole it in a by-election in 1994 and had held it ever since but not ever comfortably. The MP she would be up against was Chris Huhne who had taken over the seat in 2005 with a majority of 568. She put her house up for sale in Benfleet, Essex and moved to Eastleigh to start her campaign. The fact that this all started about a campaign for her local school and she moved away from the area and the school is something that shouldn’t be overlooked. It was a great parachute choice by the Tories – bringing in a woman into a very winnable seat. It backfired though as she was unable to take it in 2010 which was a considerable disappointment for the Tory party.

However after 831 words I still haven’t gotten to the quote that really bugged me. Yes even more than her proclaiming that Middle England is more forgotten than the issue of Aids in Africa, which is in all honesty a reprehensible thing to say. Middle England isn’t even as forgotten as lower-income England yet alone the tens of thousands of children who die every single year in Africa due to Aids but heck some people in my opinion don’t live in the real world.

She went on to say this in 2005, ‘I don’t care about refugees. I care about my little boy and I want the treatment he deserves.’ The second part of her statement is fine but you aren’t straitjacketed into caring about just your boy or refugees – you can actually care about them both. Yes there are refugees that abuse the system but there are parents and English people who abuse the system too.

In the 2011 Census 119,964 people described themselves or were described as at least one of English/Welsh/Scottish/Northern Irish/British. This means that 5,235 people in the borough identify themselves non British. Some of these people would identify themselves as refugees but would she care about these potential constituents? You have to wonder. Just bluntly saying you don’t care about certain sections of society – fellow human beings – to me comes across as callous and full of snobbery. Many refugees have come to this country and helped make it the great multi-cultural nation that it is but she doesn’t care about that – she cares about her little boy and seemingly in her opinion you can’t care for both.

She claims to be a progressive and doesn’t believe in state control but in the same interview she calls herself a ‘pro-lifer’ and would reduce the abortion timeframe to ten weeks, which is as far as I’m aware is a point where many don’t even know they are pregnant and before the 12 weeks scan which is the first big hurdle to overcome. So the state shouldn’t get involved…unless it is an issue she feels passionately about and then the state should very much be involved. Yeah sound free-thinking logic there…

Politics to me isn’t just about policies it is about the people. I identify myself as a Liberal Democrat but that doesn’t mean I agree with everything they do or what certain people in the party do or say. Some I would campaign for hard and some I wouldn’t. People have to pass the so called ‘sniff test’ to see if they are genuine.

For me Mrs Hutchings doesn’t seem to do that. She was always political, she used a TV show to get some infamy and not to further along the cause for her son’s school as she proclaimed, she flipped from Labour to the Tories in double quick time (something that I always struggle to understand – how you can be on one side of the political spectrum and move all the way across in one swift motion but that is another story). She was at the Tory spring conference within weeks of saying she was a Labour supporter and was put on their A-list of candidates and given one of their prime targets within a couple of years. It smacks to me that the whole thing was staged and planned – it may well not have been but that is how it looks to me now looking back at all the evidence.

I just don’t know what her motives are. Is she genuinely campaigning to get the ‘forgotten Middle England’ back on the front-burner and championing disability schools? Is she really a housewife who saw a problem and decided she wanted to help provide the solution to that problem? Or was this all one cold-calculated decision to make a name for herself and get into politics?

I know what my gut feeling is, we’ll see what the people of Eastleigh say on February 28th…

I hope you enjoyed this blog post. Please leave any comments or contact me directly via the E-Mail Me link on the Right Hand Nav. You can stay in touch with the blog following me on Twitter or by liking the blog on Facebook. Please share this content via the Social Media links below if you think anyone else would enjoy reading.

Published inPolitics


  1. liberalabroad liberalabroad

    In that case she would have paid tax in Malta on the money she earned there and under double taxation agreements would not be liable to UK income taxes.
    Being born in a country does not always make you a citizen of that country as is the case in Britain now.
    Many young Britons now are having to go overseas to find work as a result of wrong policies of successive
    Labour and Conservative governments.

  2. tom redpath tom redpath

    if she quoted ” paying taxes ” in 2005 ,for how long did she do this ? From Dec ’86 – Sept 95 she was working in Malta !If her son was 12 , that makes him 3/4 Maltese , born abroad . The difference between a refugee & an economic migrant is a fine one .

  3. Dan Dan

    What has digging up a couple of quotes from 2005 got to do with her ability to represent the people of Eastleigh as their prospective MP?

    • neilmonnery neilmonnery

      Well everyone else is digging them up too. It isn’t the kinda thing that you change your mind on not caring about refugees and thinking that Middle England are forgotten compared to Aids in African children etc…

  4. liberalabroad liberalabroad

    Good post Neil.
    The Tories have little to offer the people of Eastleigh or the rest of the country for that matter.

  5. Christopher McGill Christopher McGill

    Here here yes!


  6. Christopher McGill Christopher McGill

    He came into Barton Pevril my Eastleigh college and lied. How is this any good. I am saying that he has damaged the local lib dem name.

    Even if I was not a tory, I’d vote for her as a candidate alone. Speaking around in Easteligh town centre thats the general view. We like clegg, Cameron yes, but not the lib dems locally, now THIS is a shift from even 6 months ago. Huhne makes my skin crawl!

    Tarnishes the already bad portrayal of MP’s

    • neilmonnery neilmonnery

      I’m guessing you actually can’t vote due to the fact you are at VI Form and your e-mail address has 1996 in it – implying that it your birth year.

      Obviously I’m not in Eastleigh so don’t know what the talk is on the ground but the Lib Dems locally have all the council seats in this constituency – and a Tory poll even has the LDs at 31% in the ward (Con: 34$, Lab: 19%, UKIP: 12%). This by-election will be down purely to the squeeze on Lab and UKIP. If the Lab squeeze is successful more than the UKIP then the LDs should win, if the UKIP squeeze is better then the Tories will win. There is a reason both parties are available at odds against on the markets!

      The sad thing is his lie was over something so stupid and needless that it ruined a very promising career. It showed that he is a flawed human being and that brought his downfall.

  7. Christopher McGill Christopher McGill

    Would they? I know Maria once offered to take my grandmother for a hospital appointment – this is with her busy schedule. I believe that her change in political views from a child till now, shows a sense of open mindedness; something very rare in modern politics. Always open to suggestions.

    • neilmonnery neilmonnery

      She was what…43 when she confronted Tony Blair and then changed her political allegiance? I wouldn’t call her a child at that point in her life.

      As for Huhne and the people of Eastleigh – watching all the VoxPops that all the news channels did on Monday it seems everyone they spoke to thought he was a decent guy and good local MP and that is why they are disappointed in his actions.

  8. Christopher McGill Christopher McGill

    You are totally wrong. I know her personally and she is the opposite of everything you say. She would be a great voice for Eastleigh, advocating our opinion on a whole range of people. She is highly intelligent and I believe would make an outstanding MP. Far better than the proven liar who came into my college denied everything – what an example Hunhe set!

    Don’t trust the Lib Dems

    Vote for Maria

    • neilmonnery neilmonnery

      She very well might be but they are quotes that she has said in the past. As an outsider not knowing her it doesn’t pass the ‘sniff test’ as I put it – something just doesn’t add up.

      As for Huhne, he was a liar and clearly to some degree a bully and a nasty piece of work. I have already written about that. However he was actually a very good MP for all his downsides (which seem considerable) and the majority of Eastleigh folk would attest to that.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *