The Rambles of Neil Monnery

Another pointless voice in the vast ocean that is the interweb

Vince Cable was right – how many times can we say it today? Is 3,941,939 enough?

with 2 comments

Need I really say more?

I suppose I must.

Vince Cable has long been one of the most liked Lib Dems around. One thing everyone knew about Vince was that he wasn’t a huge fan of the Murdoch empire. None of the Lib Dems were. They never tried to curry favour with the empire unlike the other two main parties. Some argue that the only reason they didn’t was because the Murdoch’s saw the Lib Dems as insignificant but that is pure conjecture. These are the facts:

*The Lib Dems never liked the Murdoch’s.
*The Tories did like the Murdoch’s.
*Labour liked the Murdoch’s.
*Labour only stopped liking the Murdoch’s when the Milly Dowler phone-hacking case came to light and the national bandwagon of hate was rolling.
*Had the Telegraph not done that sting on Vince Cable then the Murdoch’s wouldn’t have the power they have today.
*Jeremy Hunt – who took over that role of deciding the Murdoch’s fate loved the Murdoch’s.
*Ed Miliband would have sacked Vince Cable for talking to people he believed where constituents regarding the nuclear option over the Murdoch’s.

Had David Cameron, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, Jeremy Hunt, Ed Miliband or any of the top tier MPs from either the Labour Party or the Conservative Party worked out that the Murdoch media empire wasn’t exactly all sweetness and light and tried to regulate them then we wouldn’t have got to the state we are in today. The media are not trusted in large part due to the Murdoch’s and lack of regulation.

The banking crisis was due to a lack of regulation as well. That one lies at the foot of Labour who had their eyes off the ball thinking that the good times would never leave.

What we have learned is that regulation is an extremely important part of our world. Without good practice bad things will happen. Even if my day job industry of Search Marketing there are Black Hat and White Hat ways of working. Black Hat will be great short term but if Google catches up with you then bad times are ahead.

Vince – in retrospect – was foolish to talk freely knowing that journalists are everywhere but one thing he wasn’t was wrong. Vince Cable was right to be ready to block the Murdoch’s bid for Sky News. He was right to look at the empire with cynical eyes. James Murdoch is currently on my TV proving one thing and one thing only – he isn’t his father – and that isn’t a good thing. Rupert knew how to talk his way out of trouble. James can’t talk his way out of a paper bag and nor can he stop digging a hole for himself and his company and those who backed them.

The Lib Dems were on in bed with the Murdoch’s. The other two parties were constantly squabbling over who would get to sleep with them.

Whatever you think of the Lib Dems one thing is for sure. The Liberal Democrats always want a free press and believe in a free press. The other two parties are willing to deal with a non-free press as long as the slant is towards them…

Note: Murdoch’s, Murdochs or Murdochs’? That is the question.

BBC are happily going with Murdoch’s so I have decided to go with them. If they are wrong then so am I.

I hope you enjoyed this blog post. Please leave any comments or contact me directly via the E-Mail Me link on the Right Hand Nav. You can stay in touch with the blog following me on Twitter or by liking the blog on Facebook. Please share this content via the Social Media links below if you think anyone else would enjoy reading.

  • Share on Tumblr

Written by neilmonnery

April 24th, 2012 at 3:06 pm

Posted in Politics

Tagged with , ,

2 Responses to 'Vince Cable was right – how many times can we say it today? Is 3,941,939 enough?'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Vince Cable was right – how many times can we say it today? Is 3,941,939 enough?'.

  1. the TV news media still seems scared of saying his name! Vince, Vince Cable – there I’ve said it! But then I haven’t got anything to lose!

    With or without Murdoch’s – in media circles – The Sun is still a paper that can put your political windows through!

    I have to say just how absolutely shifty Hunt looks on TV, the blink rate and the shifty eyes.

    Newsfrowned

    24 Apr 12 at 7:10 pm

  2. Re: Murdoch’s, Murdochs or Murdochs’

    3 spellings, 3 meanings:

    Murdoch’s company = Murdoch his face = face of Murdoch

    Murdochs = James and Rupert Murdoch i.e. plural

    Murdochs’ company = [the] company of James and Rupert Murdoch i.e. plural

    There! That’s not too difficult to remember, is it?

    Chris Squire

    28 Apr 12 at 1:14 pm

Leave a Reply